About

Tag: Time

  • the entire history of spacetime, i guess (part 3)

    the entire history of spacetime, i guess (part 3)

    By Aashritha Shankar

    ~ 11 minutes


    While the concepts of space and time were fundamental to the Newtonian world, centuries of digging deeper into the mechanics of our universe have uncovered that it isn’t all as simple as it seems. From Einstein’s Special Relativity to theories of multi-dimensional time, the science behind space and time has evolved into a complex field.

    Why Extra Temporal Dimensions?

    The search for extra spatial dimensions raises questions of the potential for extra temporal dimensions. If space can have more dimensions, why can’t time? The motivations to explore the potential for extra temporal dimensions arise from a desire to better understand the nature of time and the symmetries between them.

    Another reason to study these extra-temporal dimensions is the desire to unify seemingly disconnected parts of time. Many frameworks for extra temporal dimensions have revealed previously unnoticed symmetries and relationships between different temporal systems that would not be discovered while only working in one dimension.

    The concept of “complex time” is used to fix some of the problems of quantum mechanics. This idea suggests that time should be represented as a complex value rather than a real number. It would allow more ways to represent wave-particle duality, entanglement, and other fundamental concepts of quantum physics.

    2T-Physics

    Proposed by physicist Itzhak Bars, 2T-Physics suggests that the one dimension of time we experience is really just a “shadow” of the real two dimensions of time. The core motivation of 2T-Physics is to reveal the deeper temporal connections that we don’t see in our one-dimensional perspective. In 2T-Physics, two seemingly disconnected temporal systems are actually connected and represent different views or ‘shadows’ of the same two-dimensional time. 

    2T-Physics unifies a wide range of physical systems using “gauge symmetry,” which is the property of a system where a set of transformations, called gauge transformations, can be used on a system without changing any of the physical properties of that system. Bars also illustrated that the Standard Model could be explained by 2T-Physics with four spatial dimensions. Not only can this model predict most of the Standard Model, but it also provides a solution to some quantum issues.

    An interesting difference between the Standard Model and the predictions of 2T-Physics is the gravitational constant. While it is currently established that the coefficient in gravitational equations is a constant 6.67⋅10-11, the mathematics of 2T-Physics means that the gravitational constant has different values for different periods of our universe (inflation, grand unification, etc). This allows new possibilities for early expansion of our universe that General Relativity and the Standard Model do not. Through its new perspectives, 2T-Physics allows a more complete framework of gravity, especially at higher dimensions.

    While 2T-Physics is well-established, it remains highly theoretical and has little to no practical impact. While there is no evidence directly supporting the theory, 2T-Physics predicts certain connections between different physical systems that could potentially be verified through complex experiments, though none have been conducted so far. Above all, 2T-Physics provides a new perspective on time and the nature of the laws of physics that has opened the eyes of many scientists and will likely inspire future discoveries.

    3D Time

    One of the most recent papers in the field, Kletetschka, proposes a mathematical framework of spacetime that includes temporal dimensions. Kletetschka provides a new perspective on combining gravity and quantum mechanics. Instead of having two hidden dimensions of time, Kletetschka theorizes that each of these dimensions is used to represent time at different scales: the quantum scale, the interaction scale, and the cosmological scale. He explains that the other two dimensions are not visible in our daily life because they occur at very small (quantum) levels or very large (cosmological) levels.

    Figure 3, Three-Dimensional Time: A Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics, World Scientific Connect ©

    A massive difference between this theory and conventional physics is that while conventional physics considers space to be something vastly different from time, Kletetschka proposes that space is a byproduct of time in each of these dimensions, rather than an entirely separate entity. What we experience as mass or energy actually arises from the curvature of time in these three dimensions. As Kletetschka explored more into this, he discovered surprising consistency in the mathematics, leading to a deeper exploration into the concept.

    The key to not creating causality issues and instability in the theory was the usage of regular geometry and spatial dimensions instead of exotic situations that are hard to prove or test. This theory aimed to address many of the long-standing issues in quantum mechanics, and its success thus far makes it a prominent theory in the field.

    The theory is able to add extra temporal dimensions without causing causality issues, something very few theories of its type have been able to grapple with. This is due to its structure. The theory is designed so that the three axes share an ordered flow, preventing an event from happening before its cause. Furthermore, these three axes operate at very different scales, leaving very little overlap between them. The mathematics of the framework does not allow for the alteration of events in the past, something that many other theories allow.

    The theory is able to offer physical significance and a connection to our world alongside mathematical consistency. Things such as finite quantum corrections, which other theories were not able to predict, were mechanized by this model without creating extra complexity.

    This mathematical framework is able to predict several properties and new phenomena that can be experimentally tested, allowing pathways to prove or disprove it soon. Meanwhile, many scientists have spoken in support of the theory, considering it a promising candidate for a near “Theory of Everything” just a few months after its publication.

    Conclusion

    While the theoretical motivation for extra dimensions is compelling, the reality of their existence remains unconfirmed. Meanwhile, the scientific community works to experimentally prove or disprove their existence through observational evidence.

    The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is one of the major players on the experimental side. They engage in many experiments, a few of which I have highlighted below.

    1. Tests for Microscopic Black Holes: Many of the theories that propose extra dimensions lead to increased gravitational power within short distances. This manifests physically as microscopic black holes that would dissipate near instantaneously due to Hawking Radiation. However, the byproduct of this dissipation would be particles detected through the LHC.
    2. The Graviton Disappearance: Another common feature of extra-dimensional theories is the manifestation of gravity as a particle called a graviton. That particle would disappear into these extra dimensions, taking energy with it. This would result in an imbalance in the total energy of the system.

    While experiments have managed to provide more limitations for potential values that would work in certain theories, they have yet to prove or disprove them.

    Meanwhile, it is important to consider what extra dimensions would mean for us and the way we live. The concept of extra dimensions provides multiple philosophical considerations for us as humans. This concept completely changes our worldview and affects our perception of the universe. Dr. Michio Kaku explains this through the analogy of a fish in a pond, unaware of the world outside its simple reality. Our perception of reality is limited, not only by our understanding of physics, but also by the biology of our brains.

    The work towards a “Theory of Everything” is not only a physical goal but a philosophical one as well. We strive to understand our universe and everything within it in the simplest way possible. It embodies human desire for ultimate knowledge and drives centuries of physical progress.

    Overall, the concept of extra dimensions represents one of the most arduous and ambitious goals in human history. While they lack proof, these theories motivate people to search more into the nature of our universe and question the very fabric of our reality. The exploration into further discoveries about our universe truly shows who we are as humans and will continue to motivate centuries of physicists to question the very nature of everything.


    References

    6.2: Relation Between Events- Timelike, Spacelike, or Lightlike. (2022, January 20). Physics LibreTexts. https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Relativity/Spacetime_Physics_(Taylor_and_Wheeler)/06%3A_Regions_of_Spacetime/6.02%3A_Relation_Between_Events-Timelike_Spacelike_or_Lightlike
    A quote from Physics of the Impossible. (2025). Goodreads.com. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8392801-but-historically-the-fourth-dimension-has-been-considered-a-mere
    Albert Einstein Quote: “When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time and space and gravitation have no separa…” (n.d.). Quotefancy.com. https://quotefancy.com/quote/763238/Albert-Einstein-When-forced-to-summarize-the-general-theory-of-relativity-in-one-sentence
    Bars, I. (2006). The Standard Model as a 2T-physics Theory. 903(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2735245
    Bars, I., & Costas Kounnas. (1997). Theories with two times. Physics Letters B, 402(1-2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00452-8
    Bars, I., & Kuo, Y.-C. (2007). Field Theory in Two-Time Physics withN=1Supersymmetry. Physical Review Letters, 99(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.041801
    Bars, I., & Terning, J. (2010). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time (F. Nekoogar, Ed.). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77638-5
    Bell, J. (n.d.). Time and Causation in Gödel’s Universe. https://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/Time.pdf
    Beuke, F. (2025). beuke.org. Beuke.org. https://beuke.org/calabi-yau-manifold/
    Centre for Theoretical Cosmology: The Origins of the Universe: M-theory. (n.d.). http://Www.ctc.cam.ac.uk. https://www.ctc.cam.ac.uk/outreach/origins/quantum_cosmology_four.phpcern. (2000, March 7). Discovering new dimensions at LHC – CERN Courier. CERN Courier.
    Church, B. (2022). Kaluza-Klein Theory. https://web.stanford.edu/~bvchurch/assets/files/talks/Kaluza-Klein.pdf
    Continuing the search for extra dimensions. (2025, July 8). ATLAS. https://atlas-public.web.cern.ch/updates/briefing/continuing-search-extra-dimensions
    DUFF, M. J. (1996). M THEORY (THE THEORY FORMERLY KNOWN AS STRINGS). International Journal of Modern Physics A, 11(32), 5623–5641. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x96002583
    Dunn, T. (2017, January 10). Classic Time Travel Paradoxes (And How To Avoid Them). Quirk Books. https://www.quirkbooks.com/classic-time-travel-paradoxes-and-how-to-avoid-them/
    Extra Dimensions. (n.d.). Retrieved August 10, 2025, from https://pdg.lbl.gov/2025/listings/rpp2025-list-extra-dimensions.pdf
    Extra dimensions – (Principles of Physics III) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable. (2025). Fiveable.me. http://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/principles-physics-iii-thermal-physics-waves/extra-dimensions
    Extra dimensions – and how to hide them «Einstein-Online. (2025). Einstein-Online.info. https://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/hiding_extra_dimensions/
    Fazekas, L. (2025, July 13). How Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory Redefined Space and Time. Medium. https://thebojda.medium.com/how-einsteins-special-relativity-theory-redefined-space-and-time-45b79573443d
    Filimowicz, M. (2025, April). Hidden Geometries: The Search for Extra Dimensions and Their Technological Implications. Medium: Quantum Psychology, Biology, and Engineering. https://medium.com/quantum-psychology-and-engineering/hidden-geometries-the-search-for-extra-dimensions-and-their-technological-implications-b999133086c9
    Foster, J. G., & Müller, B. (2025). Physics With Two Time Dimensions. ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.2485
    Gunther Kletetschka. (2025). Three-Dimensional Time: A Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics. Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences, 09. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424942425500045
    Hawking, S. W. (1992). Chronology protection conjecture. Physical Review D, 46(2), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.46.603
    Hoang, L. N. (2013, June 2). Spacetime of General Relativity. Science4All. http://www.science4all.org/article/spacetime-of-general-relativity/
    Horoto, L., & G, S. F. (2024). A New Perspective on Kaluza-Klein Theories. ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05302https://www.facebook.com/thoughtcodotcom. (2009). The Physics of Moving Backward in Time. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/closed-timelike-curve-2699127
    Hyperspace – A Scientific Odyssey: Official Website of Dr. Michio Kaku. (n.d.). https://mkaku.org/home/articles/hyperspace-a-scientific-odyssey/
    Kalligas, D., S, W. P., & Everitt,. (1995). The classical tests in Kaluza-Klein gravity. The Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, 439(2). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950044695
    Kaluza, Klein and their story of a fifth dimension. (2012, October 10). Plus.maths.org. https://plus.maths.org/content/kaluza-klein-and-their-story-fifth-dimension
    Kaluza-Klein theories. (n.d.). Retrieved August 10, 2025, from https://indico.cern.ch/event/575526/contributions/2368967/attachments/1430033/2196226/Mondragon_BeyondSM_L3.pdf
    Lee, S. (2025a). Calabi-Yau Manifolds: A Deep Dive. Numberanalytics.com. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/calabi-yau-manifolds-deep-dive-differential-topology#google_vignette
    Lee, S. (2025b). The M-Theory Revolution. Numberanalytics.com. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/m-theory-revolution
    Lloyd, S., Maccone, L., Garcia-Patron, R., Giovannetti, V., Shikano, Y., Pirandola, S., Rozema, L. A., Darabi, A., Soudagar, Y., Shalm, L. K., & Steinberg, A. M. (2011). Closed Timelike Curves via Postselection: Theory and Experimental Test of Consistency. Physical Review Letters, 106(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.040403
    M. S., M. E., & B. A., P. (n.d.). M-Theory: Maybe Even More Dimensions Can Fix String Theory. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/m-theory-2699256
    Mei, Z.-H. (2024). Time Has Two Dimensions-Exploring Coordinate Connotation of Five-Dimensional Space. 24(7), 21–25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381282542_Time_Has_Two_Dimensions-Exploring_Coordinate_Connotation_of_Five-Dimensional_Space
    Michael B. Schulz: Research Interests – String Theory Compactifications. (2024). Bryn Mawr College. https://www.brynmawr.edu/inside/academic-information/departments-programs/physics/faculty-staff/michael-b-schulz/michael-b-schulz-research-interests-string-theory-compactifications
    Muntean, I. L. (2017). Unification and explanation in early Kaluza-Klein theories. Escholarship.org. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5ws3s18g
    Research Interests – Itzhak Bars. (2024, July 15). Itzhak Bars. https://dornsife.usc.edu/bars/research/
    Richmond, A. (2018). Time Travelers. Inference, 3(4). https://inference-review.com/article/time-travelers
    Rynasiewicz, R. (2011). Newton’s Views on Space, Time, and Motion (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford.edu. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/
    Stein, V., & Dobrijevic, D. (2025, May 12). Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity. Space.com. https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html
    String Theory. (2025, May 8). Institute for Advanced Study. https://www.ias.edu/default/tags/string-theory
    Tegmark, M. (1997). On the dimensionality of spacetime. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 14(4), L69–L75. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/14/4/002
    The Many Dimensions of Oskar Klein. (2021, February 11). Galileo Unbound; Galileo Unbound. https://galileo-unbound.blog/2021/02/10/the-many-dimensions-of-oskar-klein/
    There are 2 dimensions of time, theoretical physicist states. (2017, May 9). Big Think. https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/there-are-in-fact-2-dimensions-of-time-one-theoretical-physicist-states/
    Tillman, N. T., Bartels, M., & Dutfield, S. (2024, October 29). Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity. Space.com. https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html
    Visser, M. (2025). The quantum physics of chronology protection. ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0204022
    Weinstein, S. (2025). Multiple Time Dimensions. ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.3869
    Wolchover, N. (2017). Why Is M-Theory the Leading Candidate for Theory of Everything? | Quanta Magazine. Quanta Magazine. https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-is-m-theory-the-leading-candidate-for-theory-of-everything-20171218/

  • the entire history of spacetime, i guess (part 1)

    the entire history of spacetime, i guess (part 1)

    By: Aashritha Shankar

    ~ 8 minutes


    While the concepts of space and time were fundamental to the Newtonian world, centuries of digging deeper into the mechanics of our universe have uncovered that it isn’t all as simple as it seems. From Einstein’s Special Relativity to theories of multi-dimensional time, the science behind space and time has evolved into a complex field.

    Newtonian Absolutism

    At the dawn of classical mechanics, Newton created the foundation upon which all of modern spacetime theory is built. Space and time were considered to be entirely unrelated and absolute concepts. There was no question in his mind that time moves forward and space exists around us. Space was considered a static body within which we exist, while time was described as flowing in only one direction at a steady rate. Imagine space as a box, where events are contained within, and time as a river whose current pulls us along.

    Newton coined the terms ‘absolute space’ and ‘absolute time’ to describe the absolutes from the relativity we measure. For centuries, this theory remained unquestioned, so physicists didn’t consider time and space to be real entities, but rather our human way of interpreting the world around us.

    Einstein’s Revolution:

    Special Relativity

    The first true challenge to the Newtonian perspective of space and time came in the form of Einstein’s Special Relativity. He introduced one key revolutionary concept: everything, including space and time, is relative, depending only upon the observer’s frame of reference.

    The motivations for Einstein’s work arose from the desire to eliminate the contradiction between Maxwell’s equations and Newtonian Mechanics. A simple way to visualize this contradiction is by imagining the following scenario:

    Two rockets in space are flying towards each other at a speed of 500 miles per hour. This would result in a relative speed of 1000 miles per hour. Now, if you were to throw a rock from one ship to another at a speed of 10 miles per hour, it would reach the other ship with a relative speed of 510 miles per hour. However, the substitution of light into this situation instead of a rock changes this because the speed of light is constant. No matter how fast you travel towards light, it will always come towards you at the same constant speed: 3·108m/s, or the speed of light.

    Many tests were done to prove that the wave-particle duality of light was the reason for this phenomenon. Rather than trying to disprove or explain away the theory, Einstein decided to take the constant speed of light as a fundamental property. He didn’t explain the speed of light, but used it to explain other things. Einstein was willing to give up the time-honored fundamentals of Newton’s laws in favor of the constant speed of light. 

    He began with the basic definition of speed as the distance divided by the time. If the speed of light remains constant as this rocket reduces the distance to be travelled, then the time must also decrease to preserve this equality. When mathematically calculating this, Einstein discovered the concept of time dilation, where objects in motion experience time more slowly than objects at rest. Continuing with similar methods for other properties, such as conservation, he discovered that mass would increase with speed and length would decrease. The true genius in Einstein was his willingness to question his own assumptions and give up some of the most basic qualities of the universe, in favor of the speed of light.

    General Relativity

    Special Relativity, however, did not incorporate gravity. Before Einstein, physicists believed that gravity was an invisible force that dragged objects towards one another. However, Einstein’s general relativity suggested that the ‘dragging’ was not gravity, but rather an effect of gravity. He theorized that objects in space bent the space around them, inadvertently bringing objects closer to one another.

    General Relativity defines spacetime as a 4D entity that has to obey a series of equations known as Einstein’s equations. He used these equations to suggest that gravity isn’t a force but instead a name we use to describe the effects of curved spacetime on the distance between objects. Einstein proved a correlation between the mass and energy of an object and the curvature of the spacetime around it.

    His work allowed him to prove that:

    “When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter.” -Einstein.

    Einstein’s General Relativity predicted many things that were only observationally noticed years later. A famous example of this is gravitational lensing, which is when the path of light curves as it passes a massive object. This effect was noticed by Sir Arthur Eddington in 1919 during a solar eclipse, yet Einstein managed to predict it with no physical proof in 1912.

    Closed-Timelike-Curves (CTCs)

    Another major prediction made by Einstein’s General Relativity is Closed-Timelike-Curves (CTCs), which arise from mathematical solutions to Einstein’s equations. Some specific solutions to these equations, such as massive, spinning objects, create situations in which time could loop.

    In physics, objects are considered to have a specific trajectory through spacetime that will indicate the object’s position in space and time at all times. When these positions in spacetime are connected, they form a story of an object’s past, present, and future. An object that is sitting still will have a worldline that goes straight in the time direction. Meanwhile, an object in motion will also have an element of spatial position. Diagrams of a worldline are drawn as two light cones, one into the future and one into the past, with a spatial dimension on the other axis, as seen in figure 1.

    Figure 1 / Takeshimg ©

    CTCs are created when the worldline of an object is a loop, meaning that the object will go backwards in time at some point to reconnect to its starting point. Closed-Timelike-Curves are, in essence, exactly what they sound like: closed curving loops that travel in a timelike way. Traveling in a timelike way, meaning that their change in time is greater than their change in space, suggests that these objects would have to be static or nearly static. As seen in Figure 2, the worldline of a CTC would be a loop, as there is some point in space and time that connects the end and the beginning.

    Figure 2 / Classical and Quantum Gravity / ResearchGate ©

    Two major examples of famous CTC solutions are the Gödel Universe and the Tipler Cylinder:

    • Gödel Universe: Suggested by mathematician Kurt Gödel in 1949, the Gödel Universe is a rotating universe filled with swirling dust. The rotation must be powerful enough that it can pull the spacetime around it as it spins. The curvature would become the CTC. This was the first solution found that suggested the potential for time-travel to be a legitimate possibility, not just a hypothetical scenario. 
    • Tipler Cylinder: In the 1970s, physicist Frank Tipler suggested an infinitely long, massive cylinder spinning along the vertical axis at an extremely high speed. This spinning would twist the fabric of spacetime around the cylinder, creating a CTC.

    Closed timelike curves bring many paradoxes with them, the most famous of which is the grandfather paradox. It states that if a man has a granddaughter who goes back in time to kill her grandfather before her parents are born, then she wouldn’t exist. However, if she doesn’t exist, then there is no one to kill her grandfather, thus meaning that she must exist. Yet if she exists, then her grandfather doesn’t.

    Most importantly, CTCs drove further exploration and directed significant attention to the spacetime field for decades. Scientists who didn’t fully believe Einstein’s General Relativity pointed to CTCs as proof of why it couldn’t be true, leaving those who supported Einstein to search extensively for a way to explain them. This further exploration into the field has laid the foundation for many theories throughout the years.

    The belief amongst scientists is that CTCs simply don’t exist because, while they are hypothetically possible, the energy requirements to create them are not yet feasible. Many of these setups require objects with negative energy density and other types of  ‘exotic matter’ that have not been proven to even exist yet. Furthermore, even if CTCs were to be formed, the specific region of spacetime where they form would be highly unstable, meaning that these CTCs would not sustain themselves. The situations in which CTCs would be feasible require types of fields of energy that would approach infinity and the Cauchy Horizon (the limit at which causality no longer exists, therefore making these situations physically unviable).


    All references listed on Part 3.